Re-ranking and Late Interaction Drive Retrieval Quality
Overview
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is now the standard way to ground Large Language Models (LLMs) in external knowledge, yet the design space of retrieval pipelines is large and the trade-offs between variants are not well understood, especially on domain-specific corpora at realistic scale.
The Study
This work presents a controlled comparison of six retrieval strategies for scientific question answering:
- Classic top-k dense retrieval
- LLM-based query rephrasing
- Query rephrasing followed by LLM-based reranking
- Multi-query fusion via Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF)
- Agentic tool-call pipeline where the generator decides for itself whether to retrieve
- Late-interaction retrieval with ColBERTv2
All six pipelines share the same generator (Meta-Llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct), prompt, and evaluation protocol; the five single-vector pipelines additionally share SPECTER2 embeddings and a Chroma vector store; and all six retrieve from the full corpus of 463,971 arXiv papers dated 2024-2025.
Contributions
To support reproducible, large-scale evaluation, we released a synthetic question dataset of 19,484 problem-statement and methodology questions generated by Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct from a random sample of 10,000 papers across academic domains. Every strategy is evaluated on this same query set using an LLM-as-a-judge protocol along multiple quality dimensions, together with direct gold-paper retrieval metrics.
Impact
The result is an open testbed for studying the cost and quality trade-offs of RAG design choices on a research-literature corpus, and a basis for future work on faithfulness, retrieval robustness, and agentic retrieval.
Venue
Presented at the AIxSET Conference 2026.